Wikipedia Reliability Worksheet

Wikipedia Reliability Worksheet

Article title:
Answer the following questions to see how reliable a Wikipedia article is.

1. Start with the main page. Does it have any cleanup banners that have been placed there to indicate problems with the article? (A complete list is available at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Template_messages/
   Cleanup.)

Any one of the following cleanup banners means the article is an unreliable source:

This article or section has multiple issues.	Yes
This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards.	Yes
The neutrality of this article is disputed.	Yes
The factual accuracy of this article is disputed.	Yes
This needs copy editing for grammar, style, cohesion, tone or spelling.	Yes
This may contain material not appropriate for an encyclopedia.	N
This article only describes one highly specialized aspect of its associated subject.	Yes
This article requires authentication or verification by an expert.	Yes
This article or section needs to be updated.	Yes
This article may not provide balanced geographical coverage on a region.	N
This is missing citations or needs footnotes.	N
This article does not cite any references or sources.	N

2. Read through the article and see if it meets the following requirements:

Is it written in a clear and organized way?	Y
Is the tone neutral (not taking sides)?	Y
Are all important facts referenced (you're told where they come from)?	Y
Does the information provided seem complete or does it look like there are gaps (or just one side of the story)?	Complete

3. Scroll down to the article's References and open them in new windows or tabs. Do they seem like reliable sources? (For help in determining the general reliability of a source, check out the Knowing What's What and What's Note: The 5 Ws (and 1 "H") of Cyberspace handout.)
   Reliable references:
   
   Possibly unreliable references:
   
   Definitely unreliable references:
   
   
4. Click on the Discussion tab. How is the article rated on the Rating Scale (Stub, Start, C, B, GA, A, FA)? What issues around the article are being discussed? Do any of them make you doubt the article's reliability?

The article is rated B class. It does make me doubt the information that has been provided and I probably wouldnt use any of the information in a research paper.

---

---

---

---

---

5. Based on the above questions, give the article an overall ranking of Reliable, Partially Reliable or Unreliable.

• You may use a Reliable article as a source (but remember that even if a Wikipedia article is reliable, it should never be your only source on a topic!)
  
• You may use a Partially Reliable article as a starting point for your research, and may use some
  of its references as sources, but do not us it as a source.
  
• You should not use an Unreliable article as a source or a starting point. Research the same topic in a different encyclopedia.

How did you rank this article (Reliable, Partially Reliable or Unreliable)? Give at least three reasons to support
your answer.

---

If I was a novice to the Lewis and Clark Expedition I wouldn't use this Wikipedia article as a starting point. The three editors I looked up had all been deleted almost 5 years ago. The information being discussed by the editors is petty and people are not using the correct sources to cite their information. The Lewis and Clark Expedition should be a lengthy article and there are only 4 or 5 tabs of content. Looking up the users for Wikipedia made me feel LESS confident in the encyclopedia and the information I've been reading. This subject should have a lot of information being used but it just isn't reaching my standards.